‘Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant’ Review: Jake Gyllenhaal Plays a Man Determined to Honor a Debt in Gripping Afghan War Drama (2024)

After building a career on flashy action, explosive set pieces and quippy bad-boy dialogue, Guy Ritchie dials things down to a pleasing degree, focusing more on human factors like honor, loyalty and dogged perseverance in the war thriller The Covenant. That doesn’t mean the director has abandoned his taste for brawny physical elements. But this is a serious-minded, well-acted drama that shows just as keen an interest in character, specifically the integrity of two men from vastly different cultures who provide the story of brotherhood and survival with its racing pulse.

The official title of the MGM/STX release is Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant, and while it’s tempting to respond with an eye roll to the Brit director’s elevation to auteur status 25 years into his highly variable career, the reasoning behind the decision reportedly was to distinguish the film from the dire 2006 horror thriller of the same name. Wouldn’t it have been easier just to come up with a different title? (The project was initially developed as The Interpreter.)

Related Stories

MoviesBox Office: 'Civil War' Draws Blood to Beat 'Abigail' and Stay No. 1 With $11M Second Weekend

Guy Ritchie's The Covenant

The Bottom LineA gritty change of pace for the director.

Release date: Friday, April 21
Cast: Jake Gyllenhaal, Dar Salim, Antony Starr, Alexander Ludwig, Bobby Schofield, Emily Beecham, Jonny Lee Miller, Fariba Sheikhan
Director: Guy Ritchie
Screenwriters: Guy Ritchie, Ivan Atkinson, Marn Davies
Rated R,2 hours 3 minutes

Either way, it’s ironic that this might be the most atypical Guy Ritchie film to date. Sure, there’s a certain numbing familiarity to American military dudes exchanging mock-gay banter as if the very notion of queerness in uniform is hilarious, and the dialogue in the script by Ritchie, Ivan Atkinson and Marn Davies indulges in one or two Big Noble Speeches. But for the most part, the project shows a new maturity, avoiding the glib facetiousness and tricksy plotting that have so often been part of the Ritchie stamp.

In U.S. Army Special Forces Sgt. John Kinley, Jake Gyllenhaal has found a meaty role that deftly fuses his action-thriller experience with the quieter interiority of his more character-driven work. He plays a level-headed soldier who narrowly escapes a hairy ordeal alive, subsequently falling apart and rebuilding himself when he discovers that his country’s promises to the man to whom he owes his life have not been honored.

A quick prologue shows Kinley’s unit at a vehicle checkpoint, where a truck rigged with explosives takes out one of his men as well as their Afghan interpreter. Back at the air base, John handpicks polyglot former mechanic Ahmed (Dar Salim) to replace the interpreter, despite his headstrong reputation. The unit’s mission is to find Taliban munitions caches and IEDs, but their intel has been shaky, yielding frustration as John’s final tour of duty drags on.

Commanding officer Col. Vokes (Jonny Lee Miller) agrees to turn a blind eye when Kinley suggests a less by-the-book approach and obtains a list of unvetted targets from his buddy Sgt. Declan O’Brady (Alexander Ludwig). Twice during the moves that follow, Ahmed oversteps his rank, but his instincts prove correct, saving the unit from fresh casualties. Likewise, his background in the drug trade, at one time in partnership with the Taliban, provides useful insight.

The film balances John’s video calls home to his wife, Caroline (Emily Beecham), in California with Ahmed’s reassurances to his pregnant wife, Basira (Fariba Sheikhan), that they need to be patient and continue waiting for the special immigrant visa promised by the U.S. to Afghan interpreters and their families.

What’s surprising about The Covenant is that the usual gung-ho American military bravery is mostly downplayed to focus on the strategic backup provided by on-the-ground interpreters, who risked being branded as infidels, ostracized by their compatriots and tagged for Taliban reprisals. Fifty thousand of them were employed over the two decades of the U.S. war in Afghanistan, with many killed before America could make good on its agreement to relocate them. The title refers as much to that pact as the unspoken pledge between John and Ahmed.

The screenplay weaves in just enough doubt about Ahmed’s allegiances to create tension early on. But his trustworthiness becomes clear during the nail-biting centerpiece sequence that results in a high fatality count and leaves the interpreter and Kinley fleeing on foot. Ritchie is in his element with this weapons action, with the protagonists far outnumbered by Taliban assailants, though he keeps the fates of the two men in focus without any sensationalized battle bravado.

With John badly wounded, the thriller shifts gears to track Ahmed’s resourceful efforts to deliver the sergeant back to the American air base, hauling him across rugged mountain ranges to avoid the roads and checkpoints where they are being hunted and giving him opium to ease the pain.

The narrative is switched up again once John is safely returned to California, losing his grip as his foggy memories become clear and he learns that Ahmed and his family have had to go into hiding from the Taliban. John’s growing rage with the maddening bureaucracy gives Gyllenhaal other shades to play; the calm control John showed in Afghanistan gives way to PTSD, excessive drinking and abusive outbursts on armed forces helplines. Given little choice, he undertakes to return to Afghanistan and repay the debt himself, securing the aid of military contractor Eddie Parker (Antony Starr) in another high-risk agreement that may or may not be honored.

Shot by Ed Wild in the mountainous landscapes of Alicante, Spain, the movie has a big, muscular look, with lots of expansive drone shots to isolate the characters in vast stretches of hostile territory. Without over-relying on the visual cliché of handheld agitation, the camerawork is nimble and exciting in both the central gunfight and the climactic clash at a dam designated as the safest extraction point. (Wild cites the late British conflict-zone photojournalist Tim Hetherington’s work as an inspiration.)

Ritchie and his regular editor James Herbert maintain a steady but propulsive pace over the two-hour duration, pushed along by a suspenseful score from Chris Benstead that makes evocative use of dissonant strings.

Gyllenhaal and Iraq-born Danish actor Salim are well matched in what’s at heart a two-man show, resulting in a solid, satisfying war thriller that spreads its attention evenly between hellish combat and resilient humanity. The sobering footnote that the Taliban seized back control of the Kabul government almost immediately after the withdrawal of American troops underscores the film’s welcome reluctance to glorify its subject matter.

‘Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant’ Review: Jake Gyllenhaal Plays a Man Determined to Honor a Debt in Gripping Afghan War Drama (2024)

FAQs

What is Guy Ritchie's The Covenant movie about? ›

How much of The Covenant movie is true? ›

Summary. The Covenant is not based on a true story but is inspired by the collective experiences of interpreters and soldiers in the war in Afghanistan. Jake Gyllenhaal's character, John Kinley, is not a real person but is instead inspired by real sergeants who worked with interpreters.

What happens in The Covenant movie? ›

Sergeant John Kinley (Gyllenhaal) is serving in the US army in Afghanistan, with help from local interpreter Ahmed (Salim). When Kinley is wounded, Ahmed risks his life and the lives of his family to help, ending up on the Taliban's Most Wanted list as a result.

Is Guy Ritchie's The Covenant a sad movie? ›

I'm impressed with the subject matter covered here. It's so sad and needs to be addressed. It's not the first time the American government has broken promises or shirked responsibilities resulting in catastrophic outcomes for the people who put their trust in them.

Is The Guy Ritchie Covenant Based on a true story? ›

The Covenant is not based on a true story but is inspired by the collective experiences of interpreters and soldiers in the war in Afghanistan. Jake Gyllenhaal's character, John Kinley, is not a real person but is instead inspired by real sergeants who worked with interpreters.

How scary is The Covenant movie? ›

It is a great little thriller, it isn't incredibly scary, but it is not meant to be. This movie is something you have to take for what it is, it's a movie, it's got a good background origins, they have great explanations for things that happen in the film, it connects together well.

How rich is Jake Gyllenhaal? ›

As of 2024, the actor's net worth is an impressive $80 million, making him an eight-figure decamillionaire. His wealth is a testament to his successful career spanning over three decades.

How does Guy Ritchie's The Covenant end? ›

Escorted back to Bagram, the group boards an Airbus A400M leaving Afghanistan. The film's ending title states that in the aftermath of the Taliban's recapture of Afghanistan, over 300 Afghan interpreters affiliated with the U.S. military were murdered by the organization, with thousands more still in hiding.

Where was Covenant filmed? ›

Guy Ritchie's The Covenant was filmed in Spain, not Afghanistan, but managed to beautifully capture the visual identity of the Middle East. Alicante, a popular tourist destination, was an interesting choice to represent Afghanistan due to its temperate hilly desert countryside.

Why is it called Guy Ritchie's The Covenant? ›

The official story is that we are calling this film "Guy Ritchie's The Covenant" to distinguish it from the 2006 film The Covenant. But I've got another theory. I reckon we're putting Guy Ritchie's name on it, because otherwise no one would believe it was one of his. The Covenant is a film in three parts.

Why did Guy Ritchie make The Covenant? ›

Ritchie, who co-wrote the film's script with Ivan Atkinson and Marn Davies, was inspired to make the movie after watching documentaries about the plight of local interpreters in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Why is Guy Ritchie: The Covenant rated R? ›

Guy Ritchie's The Covenant (2023)

Rated R for violence, language throughout and brief drug content.

How violent is The Covenant movie? ›

Violence & Scariness

Relentless violence, with lots of guns and shooting. Buildings and vehicles explode. Many characters are killed. Gory corpses seen.

Who is the bad guy in The Covenant? ›

Chase Collins is the main antagonist of the 2006 cult film The Covenant. He is a teenage warlock who is the descendant of the long-banished fifth family of witches from the Ipswich Colony, who formed a covenant of silence to protect them.

What language do they speak in The Covenant movie? ›

The Afghan characters in the film mostly speak some dialect of Persian, and the memory of being surrounded daily by that language came flooding back. I could often understand the Afghan characters without the subtitles. The story concerns Army Sgt. John Kinley and his Afghan interpreter Ahmed.

Is The Covenant worth watching? ›

Our Call: The Covenant is a rock-solid modern-war thriller that keeps us locked in for two hours.

Is The Covenant movie political? ›

TIME: The Covenant feels more political than your usual films. Were you trying to raise awareness about the plight of interpreters who have been left behind in Afghanistan? Ritchie: Politics implies a sort of polarization and tribal affiliation.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Reed Wilderman

Last Updated:

Views: 6503

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (52 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Reed Wilderman

Birthday: 1992-06-14

Address: 998 Estell Village, Lake Oscarberg, SD 48713-6877

Phone: +21813267449721

Job: Technology Engineer

Hobby: Swimming, Do it yourself, Beekeeping, Lapidary, Cosplaying, Hiking, Graffiti

Introduction: My name is Reed Wilderman, I am a faithful, bright, lucky, adventurous, lively, rich, vast person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.